Term
|
Definition
– Most conductive losses are medically or
surgically treatable
– Examples: Cerumen impaction, acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, perforated
eardrum
– People with permanent CHL do very well with hearing aids
• Some people may use a bone conduction aid
|
|
|
Term
Sensorineural Hearing Loss |
|
Definition
– Most sensorineural hearing losses are sensory, not neural
• Problem in cochlea
• Frequently, the outer hair cells
– Outer hair cells are extremely vulnerable to insult
– Degree of hearing loss tends to be related to the amount of hair cell damage
• The greater the degree of hearing loss the more likely OHC and IHC are involved.
Most with sensorineural losses benefit from hearing aids (depending on degree)
– Amplifying the signal overcomes the sensitivity loss due to hair cell damage
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
miniature amplifiers
– Capture incoming sound, increase its intensity, and deliver it to the ear
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– Body-worn
– Behind-the-ear (BTE)
- Open-fit BTE
– In-the-ear (ITE)
– In-the-canal (ITC)
– Completely-in-the-canal (CIC)
– Bone conduction hearing aids
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
z
y
j
m
d
b
n
ng
e
l
u
i
o
a
r |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– Less focus on miniaturization, more focus on improving performance
– Holy grail of hearing aids: Improve speech perception in noise
• Changes in signal processing technology
• Changes in microphone technology
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– New in 2005
– Key ingredients
• Fitted to ear with narrow tube
• Digital feedback cancellation
– Excellent for high-frequency hearing losses
– Have led to large increase in BTE sales
• Jump from 25% to approx. 50% in 2007
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1. Sound is picked up by the microphone
– Converts acoustic signal to an electrical signal
2. This electrical signal is then amplified and/or processed in some way
3. The receiver converts the electrical signal back to an acoustic signal
– In a BTE, sound is delivered to the ear canal by the earmold
|
|
|
Term
Three main types of processors or circuits
|
|
Definition
1. Analogs
2. Digital
3. Hybrid or “digitally programmable”
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– Sound is processed as a continuous electrical signal (generated by the microphone)
– Signal is modified by electronic components
– Hearing aid characteristics are adjusted by screw settings
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– Electrical signal from mic is converted into 1’s and 0’s
– Computer chips carry out the various signal modifications
– Characteristics are programmed using specialized software
– Can store multiple sets of characteristics
– First true digital hearing aids debuted in 1998
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Hybrid or “digitally programmable”
|
|
Definition
– Sound remains in analog form
– Electronic circuits modify the signal
– However, hearing aid settings are controlled using computer software and stored in the hearing aid digitally
– Can have multiple settings stored
– Debuted around 1990
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Hearing Aid Characteristics
– Gain
– Frequency response
– Input/output function
Hearing Aid Components
– Microphone
– Amplifier
– Receiver
- volume control wheel
- batter
- telecoil
• Automatic volume control
• Multiple memories
– Can have different internal settings for different listening environments
• Remote control
– For controlling volume, or switching between programs
• Earmold material (for BTE)
– Hard or soft; hypoallergenic
• Telecoil
– Everyone should have one
• Directional microphone
– May improve speech understanding in noise
Problem with both of these: the switch
– May be too complex/hard to manipulate for some people
– Some companies offer automatic switching for directional microphone |
|
|
Term
Hearing Aid Characteristics |
|
Definition
– Gain
– Frequency response
– Input/output function
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
– Microphone
– Amplifier
– Receiver
- volume control wheel
- battery
- telecoil
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• The difference in dB between the output and the input
• This is how much amplification the hearing is providing
• Specified in dB:
– Gain = Output level – input level
• The more severe the hearing loss is, the more gain you need
• Prescriptive formulas are often used to determine how much gain a given patient should have at each frequency
– Try to make sounds audible but comfortable
– Many approaches available
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A description or graph of how gain varies as a function of frequency
• Can be adjusted several ways
– Analog hearing aids have screw pots on the faceplate of the hearing aid
– For digital and hybrid instruments, the response is programmable
• Ideal goal: Maximize audibility of speech
– Some formulas use the Articulation Index to prescribe gain
- we don't need to provide gain in frequencies that they can hear
- hearing aids have a hard time amplfying things >4000Hz
|
|
|
Term
Input-output (I/O) function
|
|
Definition
Shows how hearing aid output changes as a function of input level
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
have constant gain for all input levels (to some max. output)
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
gain varies depending on input level
• Low-level sounds are amplified more (they get more gain) than high-level sounds
• Special prescriptive formulas have been developed for nonlinear hearing aids
– They set the I/O characteristics based on the patient’s loudness growth function
• Measured using rating scales
– Goal: Make speech audible but never uncomfortable
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• Microphone – options:
– Omnidirectional
• Single microphone, picks up sound equally well from all directions
– Directional (2 or more microphones)
• Designed to give strongest response to sounds in front of the wearer
• The best way to improve speech understanding in noise w/ a hearing aid
• May have a switch or be automatic
• Amplifier (or processor)
– Can be analog or digital, linear or nonlinear
• Receiver
– Converts electrical signal back to an acoustic signal for delivery to ear
• Volume control wheel
– User can adjust gain as desired
– Nonlinear aids do this automatically – often called automatic gain control (AGC)
• Battery
– Usually the largest part of the hearing aid
• Telecoil
– Picks up magnetic signals
• From an analog telephone
• From an induction loop
– Around a room
– Around the neck
- User switches aid from “M” to “T”
|
|
|
Term
Things to Consider with Hearing Aid Selection |
|
Definition
– Candidacy
– Type/style of hearing aid
– Hearing aid features
– Monaural vs. binaural fitting
– Expectations
|
|
|
Term
Tasks to Complete with Hearing Aid Selections |
|
Definition
– Medical clearance (referral or waiver)
– Loudness growth measures
– Earmold impressions
– Pre-testing for later validation
• Soundfield testing
• Speech in noise
• Questionnaires
|
|
|
Term
What determines candidacy for a hearing aid?
|
|
Definition
- Whether they are handicaped by the hearing loss
- Whether they will benefit from hearing aids
- Whether they wan hearing aids
|
|
|
Term
Selection of a Hearing Aid |
|
Definition
• Selection involves matching hearing loss with:
– Communication needs
– Style
– Technology
• Type, degree, and configuration of hearing loss are the most important determinants of
– the style and features of HA
– type of signal processing
|
|
|
Term
Considerations of Selecting a Hearing Aid |
|
Definition
– Required gain and desired features
• The larger the hearing aid, the greater gain and more features you can get
– Physical condition of outer ear
• Including size, cerumen production, skin sensitivity
– Cosmetic concerns
– Financial concerns
• Average prices by technology
(2005):
– Digital = $2022
– Analog = $935
|
|
|
Term
Advantages of Binaural Fittings |
|
Definition
– Better sound localization
– Binaural summation
• It’s easier to hear with two ears than with one
– Improved speech recognition in noise
– More natural sound quality
– Avoid auditory deprivation effects
|
|
|
Term
Advantages of Monaural Fitting |
|
Definition
– Asymmetrical hearing loss
– When one ear is not a candidate for some reason
• Poor word recognition abilities
• Physical status
– Mild hearing loss
• Binaural benefits increase as hearing loss gets more severe
|
|
|
Term
Before the Hearing Aid and Fitting and Verification |
|
Definition
– Is the hearing aid doing what it’s supposed to be doing?
– Verify using electroacoustic analysis in a hearing aid test box
• Compare to manufacturer specifications
• Pre-adjust hearing aid settings to meet prescriptive targets for gain and output
|
|
|
Term
During the Hearing Aid Fitting and Verification |
|
Definition
Fit the hearng aid using real-ear measurements
– Measure sound @ eardrum without the hearing aid, then with the hearing aid
– Adjust the hearing aid to meet prescriptive targets and achieve good sound quality
|
|
|
Term
Funcational Gain Hearing Aid Fitting and Verification |
|
Definition
– Measure aided pure tone thresholds in the soundfield and compare to unaided
– Functional gain = difference between these two measures
– NOT RECOMMENDED as replacement of Real Ear
• Can also use speech measures to verify performance
– Quality judgments
– Recognition abilities (in Q and N)
• Other things to check:
– Aid fits securely in the ear
– No feedback at desired volume setting
– Comfort
• Should never have to “break it in'
– Patient can insert and remove
– Patient can manipulate volume, battery, any switches
– Cosmetic appeal
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Patient needs a realistic picture of what to expect from hearing aids
• Reasonable goals:
– Significant benefit (i.e. aided better than unaided) in both quiet and noise
• Note, noisy conditions will always be harder than quiet conditions
– Soft sounds are “soft but audible”, average sounds are “comfortable”, loud sounds are “loud but not uncomfortable”
• Reasonable goals:
– Comfortable physical fit
– One’s own voice should sound acceptable (no occlusion effect)
– No feedback when aid is placed properly in ear, at a comfortable volume
• Patient must communicate with dispenser if any goals aren’t met
– Can fix the problem
– Can return the aids for a refund
|
|
|
Term
Conventional Hearing Aid Limitations |
|
Definition
– insufficient amplification/gain
• 80 dB gain at 1 KHz vs. 80 dB gain at 4 KHz,
– acoustic feedback,
• In high gain aids or ITE aids
– distortion of spectral shape and phase shifts,
• Best gain in 500 Hz to 2000 Hz region (miss lows and highs)
– nonlinear sound distortion,
• With high level output can get distortions
– occlusion effects,
• Tight seal = uncomfortable, pressure, aural fullness
– cosmetic appearance,
– abnormalities in the ear canal prevent use of a conventional hearing aid
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A, Conventional air-conducting hearing aid.
B, Implantable aids with piezoelectric actuator
(e.g., Rion-E, Otologics MET, and Implex TICA).
C, Implantable aids with piezoelectric sensor and
actuator (e.g., St. Croix Envoy).
D, Implantable aids with magnetic actuator (e.g.,
Vibrant Med-El Soundbridge, Soundtec DDHS).
E, Bone-anchored hearing aid (e.g.,
Cochlear/Entific BAHA). EAC, external auditory
canal; TM, tympanic membrane.
|
|
|
Term
Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids |
|
Definition
• Use for conductive losses
– Chronically draining ears
– Discomfort from levels with traditional HAs
– Large mastoid bowl or meatoplasty
– Otosclerosis
– Tymplanosclerosis
– Canal atresia
|
|
|
Term
|
Definition
• Implantable middle ear hearing aids (like conventional HAs) employ a microphone and a signal processor that amplifies and alters the sound signal
– The implantable middle ear hearing aids convert the
electric signal into a mechanical energy that is coupled directly to the ossicular chain.
• Piezoelectric Transducer
– Ossicles are connected to an amplifier using a piezoelectric crystal vibrator.
• Electromagnetic transducer:
– generates a magnetic field (via a coil) that carries a current
• in turn this encodes the output of the microphone
– do not directly contact the ossicular chain
– rely on electromagnetic transmission to a unit that is
attached to the ossicles (smaller unit, more distortion free amplification)
|
|
|
Term
The Otologics MET (Middle Ear Transducer)
|
|
Definition
– Uses peizoelectric transducer
– Original MET was semi-implantable
– Now it is fully implantable marketed as the Carina
– uses a subcutaneous microphone rather than an external microphone
– Phase I trial results in the United States showed 10 to 20 dB of functional gain across audiometric frequencies at 3 months postoperatively
– Pure-tone bone averages were minimally changed from preoperative values.
– Some poorer performance initially with device compared to conventional HAs
– Greater subjective benefit
|
|
|