Term
|
Definition
- Stimulus-Stimulus learning
- association b/w two stimuli
ex.) redness & ripeness w/ fruit
-SS learning usually not evident except in specific test procedures (would have to see someone choose a red fruit to eat in order to have evident red-ripe learning) |
|
|
Term
What is an example of behaviorally silent learning? What does behaviorally silent mean? |
|
Definition
- behaviorally silent: no visible manifestation
- children can learn things about a car just by watching adults drive: purpose of gas, break pedals, steering wheel
|
|
|
Term
What is the difference b/w learning and evolution? |
|
Definition
- learning: occurs in an organism's lifetime
- evolution: occurs across generations |
|
|
Term
What is the difference b/w learning and maturation? |
|
Definition
-learning: requires practice, repetition in order to create lasting behavioral modification
-->limited to the practiced response
- maturation: changes due to physical growth, getting older, do not require practice |
|
|
Term
What is the definition of learning??!!!
(BIG ONE!) |
|
Definition
- a relatively enduring change
- change in potential to engage in a particular behavior
- change is result of experience with environmental events specifically related to behavior |
|
|
Term
Difference b/w naturalistic observation and experimental observations? Pros and cons related to learning studies? |
|
Definition
- Naturalistic: observe measurable behavior as it occurs under natural conditions; no manipulations
-->does not reveal reasons behind behaviors
-->can't identify causal variables, bad for learning studies
- Experimental: measures behavior under specifically designed conditions to test particular factors or variables that might influence the learning or performance of behavior
- cause of behavior can be seen through observations
- causal conclusions are inferences based on comparison of 2+ experimental conditions |
|
|
Term
What are the main features of the fundamental learning experiment? |
|
Definition
- learning is result of past experiences
- learning is a causal variable that involves past experiences with relevant environmental events
(learning cannot be observed directly)
- learning can only be investigated by experimental manipulations that isolate a specific past experience as cause of change in behavior |
|
|
Term
What types of manipulations serve as independent variables in learning studies? Dependent variables? |
|
Definition
- IV: specific past experiences
- DV: reluctant changes in behavior |
|
|
Term
What are the basic features of the general process approach to learning? |
|
Definition
- learning phenomena are products of fundamental processes that operate similarly in different learning situations
- underlying commonalities across learning situations
- generalities in rules exists in regards to the learning process (NOT regarding content or speed)
- if universal rules exist, should be able to discover general rules of learning through studying any species |
|
|
Term
Why are alternatives to lab animals inadequate for learning research? |
|
Definition
- given nature of learning, using anything other than intact organisms would not work
- plants don't have nervous systems
- w/o intact organism, cannot determine importantce of particular cellular processes for behavioral change that characterize learning |
|
|
Term
Why is knowledge of unconditioned behavior important of analysis of learning? |
|
Definition
- learning is interaction b/w training procedures and individual's pre-existing behavior
- w/o understanding unconditioned mechanisms, cannot adequately look at learned/conditioned mechanisms
- unconditioned behavior is NOT homogenous or modifiable in any & all directions
-->has determinate structure |
|
|
Term
Define reflex. What is the reflex arc and who originated this concept? |
|
Definition
- reflex: unit of elicited behavior involving specific enviro event and corresponding specific elicited response (according to Descartes)
- reflex arc: entire unit from stimulus input to response output
- Neural structures [afferent(sensory) neuron, interneuron, efferent (motor) neuron] that enable stimulus to elicit a reflex response |
|
|
Term
What is the neural organization of simple reflexes? (the journey from neurological message to actual reflex response) |
|
Definition
- sensory neuron: environmental stimulus for reflex response-->transmits message to spinal cord
- spinal cord: relays neural impulses to interneuron
-interneuron: passes impulses to motor neuron
-motor neuron:elicits reflex muscle response |
|
|
Term
Modal Action Pattern (MAP) |
|
Definition
- patterns of elicited behavior that occur across species
- "pattern" b/c not restricted to a single movement
- biologically determined |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-specific feature of an object or animal that elicits a modal action pattern
- ex.) red spot on mother gull's beak-->pecking response from chicks |
|
|
Term
Why is the concept of motivation required to characterize species-typical behavior? What are preconditions? |
|
Definition
- occurence of many actions patterns depends on motivational state
- ex.) if not hungry, no motivation to go about food-related MAPs; if organism just had sex, not as high motivation to mate, etc.
preconditions: prime or create motivation for specific behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- ethnology model
- determines which factors lead to buildup of particular type of motivation or drive that increases likelihood of corresponding modal action patterns
- performance of MAPs reduces or discharges the motivational state |
|
|
Term
Appetitive vs. Consummatory Behaviors
- how are they related?
- then list differences |
|
Definition
- in order to discharge a basic-drive state, must go through both stages
- appetitive: initial component in elicited behavior sequence
- brings organism in contact w/ releasing stimuli that will elicit consummatory response
- variable
- response to general spatial cues
- ex.) hunger-->seeking out the food
consummatory: behavior that brings elicited behavior sequence to an END
- "consummates"/finishes sequence of responses
- ex.) hunger-->eating the food |
|
|
Term
Habituation & Sensitization |
|
Definition
-occurence determined by intensity & frequency of stimulus
-habituation: decrease in psychological and behavioral response to a stimulus after repeated exposure to that stimulus over a duration of time
- specific to the eliciting stimulus
- inherent property of all elicited behavior
-sensitization: progressive amplification of a response follows repeated administrations of a stimulus
- tends to occur for more intense stimuli |
|
|
Term
What is the primary purpose of habituation and sensitization phenomena?
|
|
Definition
- regulate reflex responses
- increase efficiency of interactions w/ enviro
- ensure we response vigorously to some stimuli while allowing us to ignore others |
|
|
Term
Which of Descartes' ideas about reflexes are disproved by the phenomena of habituation and sensitization? |
|
Definition
- characterized reflexes as invariant, energized by eliciting stimuli
- habituation & sensitization show that reflexes don't occur w/ the same energy each time |
|
|
Term
Define homeostatic regulation.
How is it achieved?
Relate to habituation/sensitization |
|
Definition
- homeostatic regulation: forces that push system in one direction must be counteracted by forces to return system to desired homeostasis balance
- ex.) sweating when hot to regulate body temp
- achieved through activation of opponent processes
- habituation & sensitization are opponent processes--> regulate vigor of elicited behavior |
|
|
Term
Startle Responses, Tactile Stimuli-->relate to habituation and sensitization |
|
Definition
- Sudden burst/Soft sound-->elicits startle response (flinch at novel stimulus)
- quickly habituate, stop responding
- Tactile Stimulus: pebble in shoe
- difficult to get used to; response typically increases at first and then declines
- if very intense, repetitions may result in increased responding
- sustained increase in startle response if stimulus is intense noise |
|
|
Term
Stimulus Generalization of Habituation |
|
Definition
- stimulus generalization: occurence of behavior learned through habituation or conditioning in presecne of stimuli different from stimuli used in training |
|
|
Term
Why is stimulus specificity important w/ habituation? |
|
Definition
- habituation is stimulus specific to particular, habituated stimulus
- if new stimulus presented, habituated response will recover a bit
- degree of recovery determined by how similar new stimulus is to habituated one
- stimulus specificity is defining feature of habituation |
|
|
Term
- Define "Spontaneous Recovery"
- When does it occur w/ habituated responses?
- How does it help distinguish b/w short term & long term habituation effects? |
|
Definition
spontaneous recovery: recovery of response produced by a period of rest after habituation or extinction
- degree of recovery related to rest period
- higher stimulus frequency: less spontaneous recovery b/w trials
- responding declines more rapidly w/ frquent stimulation
- habituation declines more slowly if stimuli is more intense
- exposure to 2nd stimulus can result in recovery of previously habituated response
- ST habituation: effects last relatively short period of time w/ regard to spontaneous recovery-->don't count as learning
- LT habituation: results in response decrement that lasts one week or more at least (counts as learning)
|
|
|
Term
Define "dishabituation"
How is it different from stimulus specificity of sensitization? |
|
Definition
- dishabituation: recovery of a habituated response as result of presence of a second stimuli
- ST Sensitization: responding declines as result of time (not learning)
- LT Sensitization: evident after long periods w/o sensitization stimulis (learning)
- sensitization not as stimulus-specific |
|
|
Term
How does a period w/o stimulation affect sensitization? |
|
Definition
- Short Term Sensitization: responding goes down as result of time w/o stim (not learning)
- Long Term Sensitization: evident after period w/o stimulation (counts as learning) |
|
|
Term
Stimulus Specificity of Sensitization |
|
Definition
- greater sensitization effects w/ more intense eliciting stimuli
- sensitization effects can be ST & LT
- sensitization is NOT specific to a particular stimulus |
|
|
Term
Who was Pavlov? Why is he relevant? |
|
Definition
- Russian physiologist
- discovered classical conditioning with dogs he was studying
- bell-->Pavlov's dinner-->dogs would drool
------->bell triggers drool |
|
|
Term
Who was Skinner?
What did he do that's important? |
|
Definition
- B.F. Skinner, psychologist
- founded behaviorism
- invented "Skinner Box" to look at operant conditioning
- developed the free-operant method for studying instrumental behavior |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- developed by BF Skinner w/ Skinner Box
-permits subject rather than experimenter to decide when to start next trial
- permits investigation into how quickly response completed, how frequently subject engaged in activity as well |
|
|
Term
Who is Thorndike?
Why is he important? What did he do? |
|
Definition
- American psychologist at Harvard
- devloped 'puzzle box' for looking at learning in animals
- experiments used discrete trial method |
|
|
Term
Discrete Trial Method (who is associated?) |
|
Definition
- Thorndike w/ puzzle boxes
- participant only has opportunity to perform instrumental response at certain times
- experimenter determines the times
- subjects can only go about puzzle-box behaviors when inside puzzle box; after they do behavior, removed, cannot do behavior again until put back in for next trial |
|
|
Term
Who was Hull?
Why is he important? |
|
Definition
- American psychologist
- wanted to know what makes an effective reinforcer
- looked at homeostatic model --> organisms defend stable state w/ respect to certain biologically determined critical factors
- Drive Reduction Theory: homeostatic imbalance creates a drive state to remedy the imbalance (ex. hunger)
- thus, food is effective reinforcer b/c it reduces hunger drive
- good reinforcers are able to reduce drive states |
|
|
Term
Who was Premack?
Why does he matter? |
|
Definition
- developed the Premack Principle
- basically, highly-freely-occuring behaviors can be used to reinforce low-probability freely occuring behaviors
- only thing that matters: reinforcer response more likely than instrumental response
- ex.) sitting as reinforcer with severely unresponsive schizophrenia patients
- revolutionary: spurred looking at reinforcers as responses rather than stimuli for first time
- reinforcement no longer looked at just as function of biological needs |
|
|
Term
Who was Descartes?
Why is he important? |
|
Definition
-believed in dualism of voluntary & involuntary behavior
- physical world sends messages through senses to brain
- voluntary behavior goes all the way to
"mind" in the pineal gland
- involuntary behavior doesn't have to go to
mind
-claimed that no laws apply to function of the mind
- voluntary behavior not at all predictable
- some knowledge is innate (nativism)
-->sense of self, God, basic geometric principles |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- proponent of empiricism
- people born tabula rasa, blank slate
- learn everything through experience
- empiricism big on association: to learn something, need to make associations to various things |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
- Nativism: some knowledge innate (Descartes)
- Empiricim: born tabula rasa, all knowledge is learned through experiences, associations |
|
|
Term
Efficient, Material, Formal &
Final Causes of Learning |
|
Definition
- Efficient: necessary & sufficient conditions for producing behavioral outcome, the experience
- Material: nervous system changes
- Formal Cause: theories of learning
- Final/Ultimate Cause: biological function, utility, how whatever the change in increases reproductive fitness |
|
|