Term
parts of the plant cell that are completely digestible |
|
Definition
the cell contents: -sugars -starches -fat -protein -NPN -pectins |
|
|
Term
parts of the plant cell that are partly or completely indigestible |
|
Definition
cell wall: -cell wall -hemicellulose -lignin -cellulose |
|
|
Term
this determines the nutritive value of a plant |
|
Definition
The parts of the plant that are digestible determine the nutritive value of the plant |
|
|
Term
spacing of bundle sheaths in warm season grasses |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
anatomy of warm season grass at various scales |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
grasses with which type of p'synth have more energy? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
depiction of the types of cell walls that can be found in forage plants |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which cell wall is more important and why? |
|
Definition
The secondary cell wall is more important because it makes the frame in general. |
|
|
Term
why you don't wanna go beyond a certain age in forage plants |
|
Definition
because if you go beyond it, there’s too much accumulation of lignin |
|
|
Term
microscopic view of cellulose in a newly divided cell wall |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
microscopic view of secondary cell wall encasing primary cell wall |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
depiction of the general anatomy of a plant cell wall |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of the plant cell wall is number 1? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of the plant cell wall is number 2? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of the plant cell wall is number 3? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of the plant cell wall is number 4? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of the plant cell wall is number 5? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
depiction of the composition of cellulose |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of cellulose is number 1? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of cellulose is number 2? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of cellulose is number 3? [image] |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
which part of cellulose is number 4? [image] |
|
Definition
chains of cellulose molecules |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
structure of hemicellulose |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
starch and cellulose are made of glucose, but cellulose is harder to digest. why is that? |
|
Definition
because of the way it’s packed; chair conformation |
|
|
Term
how the number of side chains on hemicellulose affects digestibility |
|
Definition
The fewer the side chains, the more digestible the fiber. |
|
|
Term
why the hemicellulose is more digestible in younger plants than in older plants |
|
Definition
fewer side chains in younger plants |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Phenolic compound in plant cell walls, esp. in older tissue |
|
|
Term
why lignin is hard to digest |
|
Definition
because it has no repeating structure |
|
|
Term
Trees have their strength because of... |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
how lignin ca be digested |
|
Definition
can be digested with acid, but the chunks are still there |
|
|
Term
Forage “Quality” includes... |
|
Definition
1) nutritive value 2) Physical attributes of forage that regulate intake 3) “antiquality” compounds that limit intake (flavors, toxins, tannins) – these are aspects related to palatability. |
|
|
Term
nutritive value includes... |
|
Definition
-Energy Value (from carbohydrates (starch, fructans, cellulose and other cell wall components)) -Crude Protein -Minerals |
|
|
Term
how to calculate feed value |
|
Definition
Feed value = nutritive value * physical aspects of the forage |
|
|
Term
Some antiquality elements in forages |
|
Definition
tall fescue endophytes, toxins, and such |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
they can be a little bit good in terms of bloating |
|
|
Term
how to calculate dry matter digestibility |
|
Definition
(kg dry matter intake - kg fecal dry matter)/(kg dry matter intake) |
|
|
Term
how dry matter digestibility is usually measured |
|
Definition
Usually measured as in vitro dry matter digestibility using rumen fluid in a laboratory digestion protocol. |
|
|
Term
the Van Soest fiber analysis system |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
what the detergent does in the Van Soest fiber analysis system |
|
Definition
The detergent breaks apart the cell wall because the content of the cell can’t be accessed unless you digest the cell wall |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
proximate analysis summary |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
what the proximate analysis summary is used for |
|
Definition
it is used a lot, especially for concentrates |
|
|
Term
the proximate analysis summary reveals... |
|
Definition
the dry matter and moisture |
|
|
Term
why the number 6.25 is used for proteins |
|
Definition
because proteins have about 6.25% N |
|
|
Term
what happens to the organic stuff when you burn organic matter? |
|
Definition
When you burn organic matter, the organic stuff goes away, leaving behind minerals |
|
|
Term
the part of the proximate analysis summary where you got fats |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Proximate vs. Van Soest Analysis |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
why cellulose and hemicellulose can be partly digested |
|
Definition
Cellulose and hemicellulose are partly digested, thanks to microbes and such |
|
|
Term
why some of the digestible stuff goes to the feces |
|
Definition
because of microbial cells (MC) and endogenous secretions (ES) |
|
|
Term
why alfalfa is higher in protein than Timothy grass |
|
Definition
because Alfalfa is a legume |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
diagram of where energy from food can be lost |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Some energy that could be used in fermentation |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
an energy related reason animals are sometimes given antibiotics |
|
Definition
Animals are sometimes given antibiotics to minimize energy loss from fermentation |
|
|
Term
how much digestible energy can be lost? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the stage where the inflourescence moves towards elongation, something like that |
|
|
Term
amount of fiber in a forage vs. fillingness to the animal |
|
Definition
The more fiber in the forage, the more filling it is to the animal |
|
|
Term
amount of fiber vs. amount of energy |
|
Definition
When the amount of fiber goes up, the amount of energy goes down |
|
|
Term
characteristics of forages that regulate intake by the animal |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
how to calculate Estimated Digestible Dry Matter (DDM) |
|
Definition
Estimated Digestible Dry Matter = 88.9 – [0.779 x ADF(%)] |
|
|
Term
how to calculate Estimated Dry Matter Intake (DMI) |
|
Definition
Estimated Dry Matter Intake = 120 / NDF (%) |
|
|
Term
how to calculate Relative Feed Value (RFV) |
|
Definition
Relative Feed Value (RFV) = (DDM x DMI) / 1.29 |
|
|
Term
ADF is used to measure... |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
NDF is used to measure... |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
this decreases the digestibility of alfalfa |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
composition of the whole alfalfa plant |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
composition of alfalfa leaves |
|
Definition
18-28% NDF 12-20% ADF 22-35% CP |
|
|
Term
composition of alfalfa stems |
|
Definition
35-70% NDF 30-55% ADF 10-20% CP |
|
|
Term
digestibility of the contents of alfalfa cells |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
digestibility of the contents of alfalfa cell wall |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
the 3 most important polysacs in terms of forage quality |
|
Definition
-cellulose -hemicellulose -lignin |
|
|
Term
one polysac you don't want in forages if you have a choice |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
the impact of maturity on cell wall c'tration |
|
Definition
the, more mature, the more lignin in the cell walls |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
when the plant starts shifting to reproduction |
|
|
Term
why fiber increases as the plant matures |
|
Definition
because the amount of growth in the stems is higher |
|
|
Term
why the protein content goes down as the plant matures |
|
Definition
because all the plant’s focus is on the flowers and influorescence |
|
|
Term
the amount of cell walls vs. maturity |
|
Definition
As the plant matures, the amount of cell walls increases |
|
|
Term
Relative feed value (RFV) |
|
Definition
An index for ranking grass and legume forages based on combining digestibility and intake potential. Calculated from ADF and NDF. The higher the RFV, the better the quality. It is used to compare varieties, match hay/silage inventories to animals, and to market hay. |
|
|
Term
RFV is calculated from... |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the higher the RFV, the better the quality |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
It is used to compare varieties, match hay/silage inventories to animals, and to market hay |
|
|
Term
why tropical perennial grasses are lower in quality |
|
Definition
because of the distribution of bundle sheath cells |
|
|
Term
why is orchardgrass more digestible than Bermudagrass? |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
some things that factor into intake of forages by the animal |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
some things about management that factor into intake of a forage by an animal |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
some things about feed that factor into intake of a forage by an animal |
|
Definition
-palatability attributes -physical properties -nutrient availability |
|
|
Term
some things about the animal that factor into intake of a forage by an animal |
|
Definition
-capacity -appetite (energy demand) |
|
|
Term
why feed is necessary for animals |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
the limitations of using a metabolism crate to measure metabolism ofan animal |
|
Definition
-The metabolism period requires a minimum of 7 days faecal / urine collection, -May need to be varied for specific purposes but should not exceed 10 days for cattle over 400 kg confined to crates. -Feed intake is generally determined 24 hours prior to the collection period given the lag between feed eaten, and urine / faeces excreted. Hav e to start here because the forage takes about 24 hours to go thru the system. -The total length of time an animal is confined to the metabolism crate is generally no longer than 14 days, |
|
|
Term
why a metabolism crate is not a good way to measure metabolism of an animal |
|
Definition
This affects results because the animal is used to roaming free and the confinement stresses them out, affecting the metabolism |
|
|
Term
Limitations to Digestion Studies for Pastures |
|
Definition
-Forage always changing – can’t collect adequate supply of fresh forage at a constant stage of development -Digestion studies expensive and time consuming -Hard to compare many different species or varieties with different sampling dates, replications, etc. |
|
|
Term
why the forage is considered to be always changing |
|
Definition
because it doesn't stay at a constant stage of development |
|
|
Term
a means of wet chemistry for digestion studies |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
how the Van Soest Analysis works |
|
Definition
1: Grind sample to 1-mm size in a Wiley Mill (standard) (day 1) 2: Perform reflux reactions (ADF, NDF) (days 2, day 3) 3: Perform 72% acid digestion (ADL) (day 4); this digests the cellulose and leaves behind lignin 4: Ash sample (day 5) contains minerals 5: Calculate energy values from fiber content |
|
|
Term
disadvantages of the Van Soest Analysis |
|
Definition
This is still a slow, labor intensive method – not useful for many samples, or for routine use in testing laboratories. |
|
|
Term
the light frequency used by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) |
|
Definition
Infrared spectrum = ~780 – 2500 nm, just above visible spectrum |
|
|
Term
why the Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) can be used to analyze forages |
|
Definition
because different constituents in a forage consistently absorb or reflect different wavelengths |
|
|
Term
what the Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) method of analyzing forages analyzes for |
|
Definition
relationships between particular wavelengths and certain components, such as NDF |
|
|
Term
methodology of Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) in brief |
|
Definition
1 – Evaluate reflectance of many samples 2 – Calibrate the reflectance based on wet chemistry 3 – Predict the values of samples not run with wet chemistry |
|
|
Term
even with Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS), you still gotta do the wet chemistry from time to time. why is that? |
|
Definition
to determine the parameters; most of the time, it is species specific |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
-Grind sample to 1-mm size in a Wiley Mill (standard) (day 1) -Scan sample (1 minute each) -Select* a subset of scanned samples to run through wet chemical analysis -Calibrate* spectral characteristics using wet chemical results -Predict remaining samples without wet chemistry
*Can be skipped if a calibration equation has already been developed. |
|
|
Term
how to estimate Net energy of lactation (Mcal/lb) (NEL) |
|
Definition
NEL = 1.50 - (ADF% x 0.0267) |
|
|
Term
Problems with Predictions when it comes to forages |
|
Definition
Assume ADF has constant relationship to digestibility – not true in reality Better to use a measure of digestible fiber than ADF |
|
|
Term
Relative forage quality (RFQ) |
|
Definition
An index for ranking grass and legume forages based on DN and intake potential. Calculated from NDF, CP, EE, NDFD, ADF, and NFC. It matches animal performance better than RFV across a wide range of forages. |
|
|
Term
advantage of RFQ over RFV |
|
Definition
It matches animal performance better than RFV across a wide range of forages. |
|
|
Term
the analysis that gives you more details |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
the analysis that gives you a better indication of performance |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
advantages of proximate analysis |
|
Definition
Proximate analysis gives you more details and a better indication of performance |
|
|
Term
The toxic range for nitrates |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
all the parameters and such |
|
|
Term
why dry matter yield peaks in March or spring |
|
Definition
because of the cool season forages |
|
|
Term
when warm season grasses have their peak |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
maximum yield corresponds with... |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Older forage tends to have (more or less) energy available |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
when you need to supplement feed |
|
Definition
at the point of lowest energy |
|
|