Term
|
Definition
study of how words are formed into phrases, and phrases into sentences. For words are not randomly combined. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
govern how words may be combined into larger units. Just like morphology & phonology in regards to sound combinations. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
every clause is organized around a predicate; syntactic subject in English. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Predicates that only have a subject are called |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Intransitive predicates like giggle have one argument: |
|
Definition
there must be a giggler. Nina is the giggler. |
|
|
Term
Intransitive predicates with 1 subject are described as |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
1. [SUBJ Nina] giggled.[SUBJ The baby] cried. [SUBJ A large dog that lives down the street] howled. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Some predicates have no arguments, but |
|
Definition
They still require a subject |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
no semantic meaning. BUT, English needs a subject of SOME sort. So we use 'it' when there is nothing else. |
|
|
Term
Many languages do not require a |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
verbs that describe events with 2 NP participants. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
verbs that have 2 arguments Ie., Alec petted the puppy |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
second argument is a structural syntactic position that follows the verb in English. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Trivalent/Ditransitive verbs |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
Trivanent/Ditransitive Generally describe an event of |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
precedes direct object Ie., [SUBJ Mimi] lent [IO Johnny] [OBJ her favourite pen] 2. [SUBJ Johnny] sent [IO Santa] [OBJ a letter] |
|
|
Term
Some ditransitive verbs have a |
|
Definition
subject, object, and oblique object. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
NPs that are introduces by prepositions like in, for, or to. Generally follows the object. |
|
|
Term
Syntax generalizations in intransitive clauses |
|
Definition
[S_Nina] burped & S-V word order. |
|
|
Term
Syntax generalizations In transitive clauses: |
|
Definition
[S_Nina] belched [O_ the national anthem] & Subject-Verb-Object word order |
|
|
Term
Syntax generalizations In distransitive clauses |
|
Definition
[S_Nina] blew [IO_me] [O_a kiss] & Subject-Verb-Indirect Object-Object word order |
|
|
Term
Syntax generalizations In ditransitive clauses with an oblique (X) |
|
Definition
Nina placed her lambie in the toiled & Subject-Verb-Object-Oblique word order |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Intransitive – S-V, Transitive – S-V-O, Ditranstitive – S-V-IO-O, Ditransitive – S-V-O-X |
|
|
Term
Generally refer to the transitive word order as the |
|
Definition
order of ANY given language. Thus, English is an SVO language. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Another way to identify the subject, object, or direct object. Done with a case marker |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
morpheme added to a noun-phrase to indicate its subject, object, etc. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Very few remnants left over; seen only in pronouns. Suppletive forms of I & Me |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Some languages have more regular case marking, where word order can be more free. This is because case marking will tell us what the subject or object is, even if word order is messed. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Nominative – ga marks subjects, Accusative – o marks subjects, Dative – ni marks indirect objects |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
One case marking may be null (Ø).Russian uses this – nominative case is marked by finding the noun phrase that has no pronounced case ending. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
used when subjects are always marked with same case, regardless of whether they are subjects of transitive or intransitive verbs. |
|
|
Term
Some languages have a split ergative system: |
|
Definition
some subjects follow a nominative/accusative patters, and some a ergative and absolutive pattern like Tongan |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the same case marker, regardless of transivity |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
the same case marker for intransitive subjects and objects. Transitive subjects have a special case. |
|
|
Term
In both systems case allows the possibility for |
|
Definition
freer word order of subjects, objects, etc. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Most common type of agreement anywhere is subject agreement. |
|
|
Term
English has a very limited form of |
|
Definition
subject agreement. It is only for 3rd person singular objects, and present (habitual) tense verbs. |
|
|
Term
Many languages have a complete agreement paradigm; |
|
Definition
all subject forms, and for all tenses, triggers an agreement marker on the verb. |
|
|
Term
Complete agreement paradigm languages |
|
Definition
have this sort of agreement paradigm, it is often possible to leave the subject unexpressed. Information can be recovered about the subject from the verb agreement, and this enables speakers to leave out a subject! |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Some languages have agreement for GENDER of subject. Ie, Russian. |
|
|
Term
In many languages, verbs may agree with both |
|
Definition
subject and object in transitive sentences. For example, in Spokan Salish, a 3rd person subject is marked with a –es suffix and singular with a kwu- prefix |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
We can alter our syntax to reflect changes in voice, such as the active or passive forms. |
|
|
Term
Passive clauses are used to syntactically |
|
Definition
“suppress the agent of an event”, so they are typically used by politicians to avoid responsibility. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
can be express, but is often left out. I made poor decisions [active] vs. Poor decisions were made [passive] |
|
|
Term
Passives (like all English sentences) require a |
|
Definition
subject. But the passive operation make for a different NP. |
|
|
Term
Question formatio alternation |
|
Definition
Grammatical relations are preserved, but word order is altered. This is because wh-words typically appear at the left edge of the clause. Ie., Bill devoured an enormous turkey VS. What did Bill devour? |
|
|
Term
Wh-question formation is seen as a |
|
Definition
syntactic operation that involves syntactic movement. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Nouns (dog) Verbs (eat) Adjectives (tall) Adverbs (slowly) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Prepositions (in, to, under) Articles (a, an, the), Auxiliaries (will, should, must), Conjunctions (and, or, but) |
|
|
Term
Identifying word-classes: syntactic criteria |
|
Definition
Nouns can be introduced by a determiners (articles) Determiners = a, an, the, this, that, these, those, every. These classify nouns or identify them as unknown. Nouns can be inflected for the plural |
|
|
Term
Identifying nouns: syncretic theory |
|
Definition
Contexts of identification for nouns. Det___, Adjective ___, ___ -plural. Type of substitution test; anything that can occur on its own after the determiner must be a noun. |
|
|
Term
Identifying verbs: syncretic criteria |
|
Definition
Verbs can be introduced by auxiliaries, Verbs can be modified by adverbs, Verbs can be inflected for tense (morphological test) |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
will, would, can, could, may might. Used with verbs to classify actions and states. |
|
|
Term
Contexts of identification for verbs |
|
Definition
Auxiliary ___ - I WILL walk, ___ Adverb – I walk SLOWLY, Adverb___ - I USUALLY walk, ___-tense – I walk-ED |
|
|
Term
Contexts of identification for adjectives: |
|
Definition
Determiner ___ noun – THE tall TREE, Degree word___ - REALLY tall, Subject + be + ___ - THE RAT IS smart, ___ -est – tall-EST, ___ -er – tall-ER |
|
|
Term
Identifying word classes: adverbs |
|
Definition
Occur as verb modifiers, Walked SLOWLY, left YESTERDAY |
|
|
Term
Contexts of identification for aVerbs |
|
Definition
can be inflected for tense (morphological test)V___ - WALKED slowly, AUX ___ V – (will) NEVER surrender, ___ ADJ – extremely HAPPY, ___ ADV – extremely QUICKLY |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
group of elements behaving as a unit |
|
|
Term
A syntactic constituents is a |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
A constituency test is a way to |
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
identify syntactic constituent |
|
|