Term
|
Definition
When people provide rational reasons for or against an idea or action. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Addressing the real issue. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Assuming what the other person already knows. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Containing a clear language. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The study of the nature of a knowledge. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Pure reasoning in the abstract; focuses on Deductive reasoning. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Starts with evidence that we can obserbve and compile. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The conclusion must nesessarily be true. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Evidence that we can observe and comile. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
A comonly recognized type of bad argument. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Provides support for the subject |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An attempt to persuade without an argument. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Any sort of technique that people use to get other people to do or believe something that they otherwise might not. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
to the source; A sub group of the Fallacies of Relevance,these arguments focus on the source of the arguments,rather than the issue itself. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An Ad Fontem argument in which the speaker attacks his rival with a great deal of abusive language in an attempt to avoid the issue. |
|
|
Term
Ad Hominem Circumstantial |
|
Definition
An Ad Fontem argument that says,or implies,that the speaker`s rival should not be trusted in making his argument because of various circumstances regarding his rival. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An Ad Fontem argument implying that "two wrongs make a right". |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This Ad Fontem argument gives a statment that an idea should be discounted simply because of its source or origin. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This is sub-group of the Fallacies of Relevence where the arguer attempts to sway the opinions of the audience by making them "feel" a certain way (pity,anger,fear ect.....) |
|
|
Term
Ad Baculum (Appeal to fear) |
|
Definition
Without making a clear causal connection,a person committing this fallacy refrences the potential for bad consequences to occur if the person to whom they are speaking does not agree with them. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
The appeal to pity is an appeal to our sence of compasstion,it tries to get us to accept certain veiws rather than by giving us a good and careful reason. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
To make up for solid evedence and sound reason,this tool, often uesed by demagogues appeals to the emotions of the crowd. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This is an emotional appeal to a sence of elitism or to those of "discriminating taste". |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This argument makes the mistake of saying " you can`t prove me wrong so I`m right". |
|
|
Term
Irrelevent goals or functions |
|
Definition
This argument assumes a goal or function of a certain practice or policy that is either unrealistic, or irrelevent. |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This is an argument that makes a good case but is irrelevent to the case at hand |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
this is an argument attemting to disprove an opponent`s belifs by expanding them |
|
|
Term
Fallacies of Presupposition |
|
Definition
These are fallacies that contain hidden assumptions |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This is an argument that contains a hidden assumption that is central to what is being proved but is not justified by the argument |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An attempt to frame the argument so that only two options are possible,when there is a third possibility |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
Assumes that the correct answer is the middle of two extremes |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An argument that assumes that since something has always been a certain way it should stay that way |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
An argument that assumes that the individual part of a whole will have all the charactoristics of the whole |
|
|
Term
|
Definition
This argumentsays that all of the whole will share all the charectoristics of the individual pieces |
|
|